Literature
Why Some Popular Mahabharata Characters Fail to Resonate with Modern Audiences
Why Some Popular Mahabharata Characters Fail to Resonate with Modern Audiences
The great epic of Mahabharata has engendered countless discussions, with characters ranging from gods to mortals, all praised and criticized by scholars and readers alike. It's fascinating to observe that, despite the adoration some characters receive, there are those who fail to resonate with modern audiences. In this article, we will explore why characters like Yudhishthira (also known as Yudhishtir), Karna, and Bhishm are admired by some but fail to win the hearts of others.
The Complexities of Yudhishthira: A Dharmic Hypocrite?
Yudhishthira, also known as Yudhishtir, is perhaps one of the most enigmatic characters in Mahabharata. Known for his unwavering commitment to Dharma (righteousness), he has been celebrated for his wisdom, intelligence, and integrity. However, observing him closely reveals a more nuanced character that some may find perplexing. His actions and decisions are often criticized for their seeming illogicality and hypocrisy.
For instance, consider the incident where he accused Arjuna of arrogance for desiring to overcome his brother Ashwatthama. Yudhishthira, who had previously admitted Bheem as his favorite, suddenly claimed that Arjuna's desire to resolve the conflict was inexplicable. This stark contradiction in his choices and words has left many questioning his true motives.
Furthermore, the way he dealt with Bheem post the latter's death—wishing Arjuna had never been born—exemplifies a lack of empathy and foresight. His reaction not only echoes a coldness of character but also humorously underlines the authenticity of his character. Yudhishthira's inability to foresee and consider the broader consequences speaks volumes about his rigidity and inflexibility.
Karna: The Man of Complexities
Karna, a central character in Mahabharata, is often seen with a mix of admiration and disdain. Unlike many other characters who are either unambiguously good or bad, Karna's character is complex. He is adored for his valour, loyalty, and genuine affection for his mother, Kunti, who abandoned him as a child.
However, his character is also marred by his manipulative tendencies and the controversy surrounding his identity. The fact that Karna got into arguments specifically to sabotage a woman's (Draupadi) honor speaks to his manipulative and vindictive nature. While some might find this admirable as a defense of his mother's honor, it does not justify his actions. His willingness to engage in such behaviors reveals a sense of immaturity and a lack of self-control.
Bhishm: A Possibility for Reformation?
The character of Bhishm is almost always presented as a paragon of righteousness and selfless devotion to Dharma. He is often depicted as a tragic figure who remains loyal to the Hastinapura dynasty despite knowing that their actions are morally and ethically wrong. While his commitment to his father's wishes is understandable, his decision to take a terrible vow—destined to make him last in battle—due to his father's infatuation with a woman cannot be overlooked.
One might argue that Bhishm's actions were necessary to maintain order, but who says order is always just? His oath was born out of a single act of infatuation, and one can't help but wonder if he would have made a better king. A king should ideally make decisions based on the welfare of the people rather than being bound by outdated oaths. This brings into question his judgment and whether his loyalty to Dharma should transcend rational decision-making.
In conclusion, while the characters of Mahabharata are rich and multifaceted, their actions and decisions often leave modern audiences questioning their integrity and moral compass. Yudhishthira, Karna, and Bhishm represent a spectrum of human behavior that, when examined closely, can challenge the very ideals they are meant to uphold. This critical reevaluation is essential to understanding the complexity of these timeless characters.