Historical Inaccuracy in Historical Fiction: The Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots Controversy

Introduction

Historical fiction, while often rich in storytelling and imagination, cannot stray too far from the strictures of historical accuracy. Writing about figures who lived centuries ago requires a delicate balance between creativity and factual truth. The meetings between Elizabeth I of England and Mary, Queen of Scots offer a prime example of a dialogue that wouldn't have been spoken and events that wouldn't have taken place in the context of the historical fiction genre.

Historical Accuracy vs. Creative Fiction

Historical accuracy is crucial in historical fiction to maintain a semblance of plausibility and respect for the past. However, this doesn't prevent authors from taking creative liberties for the sake of plot development, character growth, or thematic exploration. It is essential to recognize that the real-life movements and conversations of historical figures are meticulously documented, and any deviations must be well-researched and justified.

Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots: A Case Study

The relationship between Elizabeth I of England and Mary, Queen of Scots is one of the most intriguing periods in British history. Their interaction is often (and wrongly) depicted as a positive and friendly meeting. However, the reality is far more complex and charged with political and religious tensions.

Meetings Between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots

Historical evidence suggests that any meetings between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots were likely to have been brief, formal, and conducted in the context of diplomatic negotiations.

Historical Context

During Mary's captivity in England, Elizabeth I would have primarily focused on repelling Catholic threats and maintaining her Protestant rule. The meeting would have been more about strategic considerations rather than personal affinity. Mary herself was in custody and under strict surveillance, making any casual or amiable interactions highly improbable.

Documented Records

Historically, there is no evidence of any extensive or private meeting between the two queens. The most significant documented "meeting" was more of a formal interview where Mary was asked to address her alleged involvement in the murder of her husband, Darnley.

Common Historical Inaccuracies in Historical Fiction

Several common historical inaccuracies can be found in stories set in the period of Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots. These include:

1. Conversations and Dialogues

Writers often fabricate fictional conversations between these historical figures, assuming they would have shared similar interests or exchanges of polite and friendly words.

Example of Fictitious Dialogue

For instance, the interaction might involve Elizabeth I inviting Mary to the English court, expressing her desire to see Scotland thrive under Mary's rule, or Mary discussing her plans to restore the Catholic Church in England. These conversations are possible, but there is no historical evidence to back them up, and most likely they would not have occurred.

2. Events and Scenarios

Historical fiction might include fictional exclusions or inclusions in royal events, such as grand banquets or secret councils. For example, a scene where Elizabeth I is seen enjoying a sumptuous feast in Mary's honor or where Mary is privy to some secret political meeting without any literary or historical evidence to support these claims.

Example of Fictional Event

A narrative might depict Elizabeth I and Mary jointly addressing the House of Commons, discussing the challenges of governance, or even sharing a private conversation over a map of Europe. These scenarios are highly unlikely due to their diplomatic and political impropriety.

The Importance of Research and Fact-Checking

For authors of historical fiction, it is imperative to conduct thorough research and ensure that any fictional elements are grounded in as much historical truth as possible. Even the smallest detail can affect the overall authenticity of the story. Fictionalizing these interactions without scholarly support can lead to misinformation and weaken the integrity of the narrative.

Conclusion

While historical fiction offers a platform to explore the past through the lens of imagination, maintaining a balance between creativity and accuracy is essential. Depicting the meetings between Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots in a manner that aligns with historical documentation helps preserve the fascinating and often tense period of British history. Readers value not only a compelling story but also an accurate portrayal of the past.