Aragorn's Mercy and the Release of Wormtongue: A Complex Decision in 'The Two Towers'

The choice made by Aragorn to release Wormtongue at the end of The Two Towers in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings trilogy has sparked much debate and discussion. Many readers question Aragorn's decision, advocating for Wormtongue's incarceration or condemnation for the atrocities he committed. While it is clear that Aragorn's decision may appear na?ve or misguided, it is important to consider the broader themes of mercy, redemption, and the complexities of political strategy in this context.

Mercy and Redemption

Aragorn, as a character, embodies qualities of mercy and the hope for redemption. He believes in the possibility of change, a theme that runs throughout Tolkien's works. By releasing Wormtongue, Aragorn may have been motivated by a desire to show mercy, hoping that Wormtongue could find a path to redemption rather than face harsher consequences.

Political Considerations

The political situation in Rohan is tense, and Aragorn likely recognized that imprisoning or condemning Wormtongue could create further instability. Removing him from power could lead to dissent among those who still supported him. From a political standpoint, releasing Wormtongue might have been seen as a way to neutralize his influence without turning him into a martyr or further destabilizing the kingdom.

Wormtongue's Manipulation

Throughout the story, Wormtongue is portrayed as a manipulative character. While he is responsible for many deaths and has committed treason, his cunning nature could lead some to conclude that he could be more dangerous if cornered or desperate. Releasing him might have been seen as a way to neutralize his influence in a non-confrontational manner, potentially avoiding a more intense conflict.

Thematic Elements

Tolkien often contrasts themes of good and evil, and the release of Wormtongue serves to highlight the complexities of human nature. It reflects the idea that even those who have committed terrible acts may still be capable of change. This choice poses ethical questions about justice and punishment, inviting readers to consider the shades of grey in the moral landscape of The Lord of the Rings.

Conclusion

While Aragorn's decision may seem naive or misguided, it is rooted in a broader understanding of mercy, political strategy, and the hope for redemption. In the context of the story, this choice aligns with the moral dilemmas that characters face in a world filled with darkness and corruption. Ultimately, Wormtongue's release leads to further complications but also serves to illustrate the challenges of leadership in a time of crisis.

These stories have played out in ways that many normal humans go through today. I find it so interesting as I answer questions that so many people want to change what was written. While it is understandable to imagine alternative outcomes, it is important to consider the context and themes within the original narrative. If you were to write a book, you have the freedom to explore these struggles and themes in your own way, but it would undoubtedly be unique and compelling in its own right.

Write a book the way you would like to have it played out. Of course, it couldn’t be a knockoff, but it could contain the types of struggles these characters were having. By doing so, you can create a narrative that resonates with your own perspectives and experiences, offering a fresh perspective on timeless themes.