Why Saruman Does Not Appear at the End of The Two Towers Movie

Many viewers have wondered why Saruman, a crucial character from J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle-earth, is absent from the climax of The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers movie. The reason for this lies in the decision by the filmmakers to cut certain scenes for the theatrical release, prioritizing the narrative flow and pacing of the film.

Appearance in the Extended Version

Actually, Saruman does appear, but he is only seen in the extended version of the Two Towers film. The theatrical release did not include these scenes, which were cut to compress the story and improve pacing. However, his presence offers valuable insight into the events leading up to the final confrontation.

Saruman’s Final Scene

The appearance of Saruman in the extended version is brief but pivotal. He engages in a dialogue with Theoden, King of Rohan, and Gandalf. Much like the book version, Gandalf uses his power to strip Saruman of his staff, symbolizing the end of his lordship over Orthanc. Saruman, despite his power and knowledge, adamantly refuses to cooperate with the group, maintaining his loyalty to Sauron.

His last significant act is the extraction of the Palantir of Orthanc from his cloak, showing the extent of his knowledge and the pressure he is under. Saruman’s knowledge and unpredictability make his character even more formidable. He bemoans their impending doom, hinting at the futility of their struggle against Sauron.

The Outcome

Before leaving the tower, Theoden offers a radical solution. He suggests bringing Grima to the surface, hoping for some information from the outcast. Saruman, however, shows disdain for Grima and strikes him, leading to an act of desperation. Grima, seeking vengeance, stabs Saruman from behind, and he falls to the ground at the feet of his enemies. Grima himself is then dispatched by an arrow from Legolas' bow.

This scene serves as a powerful moment in the film. Gandalf, now in control of the Palantir, reveals that the Scouring of the Shire will not occur. This is a significant relief for fans of the series, as it means the true villain of the story, Sauron, has not yet made his move against the companions.

Historical Parallel: General Cornwallis

The absence of Saruman in the theatrical release parallels a similar scenario in history. In September 1781, at the end of the American Revolution, British General/Lord Cornwallis, the commander of British forces, did not attend the official surrender at Yorktown, Virginia. Cornwallis had suffered a humiliating defeat at the Battle of Yorktown, and his absence was a profound acknowledgment of his failure.

It was customary in those times for a victorious general to receive the sword of the defeated from them. Since Cornwallis could not surrender with dignity, he sent a subordinate to hand over his sword, symbolizing his loss. This decision reflects the immense humiliation he felt following his defeat.

Similarly, Saruman’s absence in the movie is a reflection of his weakened state. His diminishing role in the story is a visual representation of his failing leadership and the encroaching darkness.

While it's understandable to question the filmmakers' decision to cut these scenes, it’s worth noting that cinematic adaptations must often prioritize the pacing and narrative of the film. Saruman's appearance in the extended version provides a deeper understanding of his character and the conflicts within the story.

Conclusion

The absence of Saruman in the theatrical release of The Two Towers does not diminish his importance. In the extended version, he leaves a lasting impact on the story, and his final moments add depth to the series. His failure and the manner of his defeat echo the real-life story of Cornwallis, both serving as powerful symbols of hubris, resilience, and the consequences of failure.