LitLuminaries

Location:HOME > Literature > content

Literature

Why Harry and Meghan Still Use Royal Titles Despite Giving Up Duties

July 08, 2025Literature1931
Why Harry and Meghan Still Use Royal Titles Despite Giving Up Duties T

Why Harry and Meghan Still Use Royal Titles Despite Giving Up Duties

The decision by the third-in-line to the British throne, Prince Harry, and his wife Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, to give up their royal duties has raised questions about why they continue to be referred to by their royal titles. This article explores the intricacies and reasons behind this practice, shedding light on the historical and legal aspects.

Understanding Royal Titles

It is a common misconception that individuals who give up their royal duties must also surrender their titles. In reality, some royal titles are integral to a person's life and cannot be easily removed, regardless of their participation in royal duties. For instance, Prince Harry, officially known as 'Prince Henry of Wales,' remains a prince for life, a title that has been granted to him through royal birth. Similarly, his children retain their royal titles even though Harry himself no longer holds royal duties.

Princess Diana, Prince William, and Prince Harry are all considered members of the royal family and have royal titles conferred upon them. The titles of ‘Prince’ and ‘Duchess’ are not automatically revoked because an individual is no longer performing royal duties. This makes the decision to give up royal duties even more significant as it does not necessarily align with giving up the titles.

The Case of Meghan Markle

While Meghan Markle, once the Duchess of Sussex, currently does not hold a royal title, her children retain their titles due to their royal lineage. This situation has led to some confusion and curiosity regarding her continued use of the title. Meghan has explicitly stated that she does not wish to give up her titles, a stance that highlights the cultural and personal significance of these designations.

Legal and Historical Context

Despite popular belief, royal titles are not solely tied to performing royal duties. Even if King Charles and the parliament decide to remove Meghan’s husband, Prince Harry's, dukedom, he will still remain a Duke of Sussex. The title 'Duchess' that Meghan and her mother uses is also protected by law and can only be changed through a specific governmental action in parliament.

Similarly, Prince Andrew, who recently faced several scandals and lost his royal duties, still holds the title of Duke of York. This demonstrates that royal titles can exist independently of active royal duties. In the case of Sarah, Duchess of York, she retains her title even after her divorce, merely exempting her from royal duties.

Implications of Giving Up Royal Duties

The choice to give up royal duties often comes with more than just a loss of titles. The family, including Harry, Meghan, and their children, agreed to these conditions after entering into a settlement agreement. The agreement stated that if they refused to perform royal duties, they would lose their royal titles and princely status, as well as their financial allowance. The family endured significant pressure and scrutiny, leading to the decision to step back from active royal life.

Harry and Meghan’s decision to give up royal duties while retaining their titles reflects a complex interplay of personal decisions and public expectations. They continued to use their titles as a way to maintain their prominence and ensure their children’s positions within the royal lineage.

Conclusion

The practice of retaining royal titles while giving up royal duties highlights the multifaceted nature of royal titles and their significance in British culture. From a legal and historical perspective, royal titles can remain even when active royal roles are absent, reflecting a deeper tradition than simply performing duties. This underscores the ongoing debate about the role and relevance of royal titles in modern society.