Introduction

As one of the world's leading superpowers, the United States has a profound influence on global affairs. However, the role of the US in the Syrian Civil War remains controversial and complex. This article explores how the US can effectively contribute to ending the Syrian conflict and lays out a strategic approach for future interventions.

The Current State of the Syrian Civil War

Contrary to the commonly held narrative, the Syrian Civil War was not an internal conflict but rather a proxy war involving external parties. Orthodox narratives emphasize the actions of the United States, Saudi Arabia, and their allies, who used foreign rebels and jihadists to destabilize Syria, aiming for regime change. The roles of Russia and Iran in the conflict are significant, as they intervened to counterbalance the aggressors and restore stability. Despite attempts to cover up these truths, the reality of the conflict remains that it is deeply rooted in geopolitical strategies and interests rather than an internal struggle for power.

The Need for a Moral and Effective Strategy

Before delving into strategies to end the Syrian conflict, it's essential to recognize the importance of ethical considerations. The US must take responsibility for ending the massacre in Syria, recognizing that the international community has a duty to prevent mass atrocities.

Strategies for the US to Implement

The first step is for the US to take a firm stand against all dictators around the world. This involves boycotting every dictator and ensuring that no sun shines on the same roof as these leaders. The US must eliminate any form of duplicity in its foreign policy. By aligning with moral principles and removing corrupt leaders, the US can set a positive example for the international community.

Another critical step is to demonstrate to Vladimir Putin that continued support for the Assad regime is not in Russia's interest. The economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure exerted by the US can significantly impact Russia's economy. This could even lead to the downfall of Putin's regime if he is unable to address the public's growing opposition to his corruption. By showing that enough is enough, the US can force Russia to reconsider its support for Assad.

Supporting Local Solutions

Once Russia stops supporting Assad, the local stakeholders, including the Syrian revolutionaries, can take charge. This includes addressing the challenges posed by Iran, Hezbollah, and the remnants of the Syrian army. Additionally, the regional dynamics must be considered to ensure that the resolution is sustainable and aligns with the interests of various parties involved.

Avoiding Complicated Interferences in Complex Geopolitics

The US has a history of poorly planned interventions in Syria, which have often led to unintended consequences. The support for extremist groups like ISIL and the subsequent abandonment of these groups demonstrates a lack of strategic foresight. The US must avoid similar mistakes in the future by focusing on clear goals and effective strategies. Supporting the Kurds, who are crucial for defeating ISIL, while also considering the geopolitical sensitivities of Turkey, is a complex task that requires careful navigation.

Conclusion

The US has the power and responsibility to play a decisive role in ending the Syrian Civil War. By aligning with moral principles, taking a firm stance against dictators, and demonstrating the consequences of supporting corrupt regimes, the US can contribute to a peaceful resolution. However, it must also avoid complicating matters with poorly planned interventions and focus on local solutions that suit the needs of the Syrian people.