LitLuminaries

Location:HOME > Literature > content

Literature

The True Nature of Arjuna and Kama in the Bharata War: Moral and Tactical Aspects

October 08, 2025Literature2843
The True Nature of Arjuna and Kama in the Bharata War: Moral and Tacti

The True Nature of Arjuna and Kama in the Bharata War: Moral and Tactical Aspects

When evaluating the actions of historic characters, it's essential to consider both the moral and tactical contexts. In the epic of Mahabharata, many have questioned Arjuna's actions, especially involving the use of a woman as a shield to defeat Bhishma. Yet, a deeper understanding reveals that these actions were part of a larger strategic plan that reflected the moral complexities of warfare and the divine nature of certain individuals.

Divine Individuals and Unconventional Win

Characters like Arjuna, Bhishma, and Karna were considered divine or near-divine. They were so formidable that conventional defeat was not an option. The Bharata War required unconventional strategies to ensure victory. Bhishma, for instance, had a boon that the divine would not harm him; Karna had a divine armor. These were invincible in normal circumstances. Thus, Krishna and Arjuna, with divine support, had to employ uncommon tactics to overcome these divine warriors.

The Role of Shikhandi and Arjuna’s Tactical Mastery

The event with Shikhandi on the tenth day of the war is a prime example of this. Shikhandi led the Pandava army, facing the formidable Bhishma. Arjuna, recognizing the challenge, protected Shikhandi from Bhishma's attacks. By hiding behind Shikhandi on a different chariot, Arjuna strategically positioned himself to destroy Bhishma's weapons and then pierce his armor with countless arrows. This method was an acceptable and skilled form of military tactics, where protectors shielded their esteemed members to focus on attacking the enemy.

Arjuna’s tactical acumen was further highlighted by his use of a divine warrior, Shikhandi, as a shield. Krishna's suggestion leveraged Shikhandi's earlier rebirth from Amba, making him a weak point for Bhishma. This was a calculated and morally complex strategy that adhered to both the divine laws and the exigencies of the war.

Divine Boons and their Implications

Bhishma Pitamah's boon of choice of death allowed Arjuna to use this unique opportunity. Krishna and Arjuna had to return to Bhishma the boon he had given himself on the first day of the war. However, they cleverly chose Shikhandi as the vehicle to retrieve this boon. By showering arrows on Bhishma using Shikhandi’s form, Arjuna and Krishna managed to strategically end Bhishma’s participation in the war.

While it may seem like dishonesty from a casual perspective, these actions were part of a larger ethical framework. In the context of a divine boon, refusing it outright would have been impractical. Arjuna and Krishna respected the divine laws but also understood the necessity of the war for justice and righteousness. The use of a woman as a shield was an intricate part of these strategic maneuvers, which, while controversial, were within the realm of acceptable tactics.

The Necessity of Unconventional Methods in War

The Bharata War was not just a clash of armies but a moral conflict. Characters like Bhishma and Karna were not just warriors; they were divine beings with unwavering principles. The ultimate victory required unconventional methods to navigate through their invincibility. Arjuna's actions, while debatable, were integral to this process.

Every aspect of Arjuna's conduct, from employing unconventional shield tactics to respecting divine boons, reflects a complex ethical framework. He embodied the moral ambiguity and strategic necessity that defined this historic conflict.