The Shakespeare Issue: Why People Feel Compelled to Lie?

There is a longstanding debate surrounding the authorship of William Shakespeare's works. While many scholars and enthusiasts accept him as the sole author, others have questioned his true identity and participation. This essay aims to explore the reasons why people might feel compelled to lie about the Shakespeare issue, providing a detailed analysis of the key points of contention.

The Shakespeare Issue

The 'Shakespeare issue' primarily revolves around three major questions:Did William Shaksper, from Stratford-upon-Avon, actually write the plays, poems, and sonnets attributed to William Shakespeare?Was William Shakespeare gay?Was William Shakespeare the sole author of his works?

Why Lie About the Shakespeare Issue?

Historically, the authorship of William Shakespeare's works has been a subject of skepticism and even suspicion. People might feel compelled to lie or spread misinformation for several reasons:

1. Financial Interest

Stratford-upon-Avon, as the birthplace and burial site of William Shakespeare, has significant tourism and economic benefits. If it were discovered that Shakespeare was not the author, the town's tourism industry could suffer a severe blow. This financial stake creates a strong incentive to maintain the status quo and support the traditional narrative of Shakespeare's authorship.

2. Academic Prestige

The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, a prestigious institution dedicated to researching and promoting Shakespearean studies, might also have an interest in maintaining the traditional authorship. Any alternative theories could undermine the credibility of their scholarship and scholarly legacy, potentially leading to a loss of academic prestige and funding.

3. Preservation of Historical Myths

Shakespearean authorship forms a cornerstone of English literary history and tradition. Challenging this narrative could lead to the dismantling of long-held beliefs and myths. Some may feel compelled to protect these historical narratives, even if they are not entirely accurate.

Controversial Questions

Did William Shaksper of Stratford-on-Avon actually write "Shakespeare's" works?

The identity of the real "Shakespeare" has long been a topic of debate. Some speculate that other candidates such as Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford, or Christopher Marlowe were the true authors. The absence of concrete evidence linking Shaksper to the works is often cited as a key issue. Questions surround the discrepancy between the playwright's alleged education and his knowledge of court life, which some argue is inconsistent with Shaksper's background as a playwright.

Was William Shakespeare gay?

Speculation about Shakespeare's sexuality often stems from the complex themes and characters in his plays, which some interpret as indicative of a gay author. However, the lack of direct evidence makes this issue highly controversial. While some suggest that his works could be an coded reflection of his sexuality, others argue that such interpretations are speculative and unfounded.

Was William Shakespeare the sole author of his works?

The authorship question also extends to the possibility of multiple authorship. Some argue that other playwrights, such as Christopher Marlowe or Thomas Nashe, may have contributed to Shakespeare's works. This theory is based on the stylistic differences and the collaborative nature of Elizabethan theatre. However, evidence for such collaborative efforts remains scarce, leaving the debate unresolved.

Questions and Puzzles

The authorship question presents numerous puzzles and inconsistencies:

Why is the image of Shakespeare in the First Folio so incongruous? The half-back/half-front doublet shown in the First Folio, a large and expensive publication, raises questions about the intent behind the image. It may have been a deliberate visual joke, or a reflection of the author's perceived identity as a playwright rather than a grain and wool broker.

Why is there no evidence of interrogation for the authorship of "Richard II"? Since Shakespeare was involved in writing and performing the play, the lack of any record of interrogation suggests there were no suspicious activities related to the play's content. This in itself is a puzzle, as such plays could have been seen as politically sensitive.

Why was Shakespeare's coat of arms not included in the First Folio? The omission of this symbol, which would have solidified his identity as the author, suggests a deliberate choice, perhaps to maintain anonymity or protect him from potential dangers associated with the worm-worm plays.

Conclusion

The Shakespeare issue remains a contentious and multifaceted debate. While there is a compelling case for maintaining the traditional narrative, there are still many unanswered questions and puzzles that continue to intrigue scholars and enthusiasts alike. Whether driven by financial, academic, or historical interests, the urge to lie about or support the traditional authorship of William Shakespeare is a complex and fascinating aspect of literary history.