LitLuminaries

Location:HOME > Literature > content

Literature

The Ethical Dilemma of Arjuna: Why He Refrained from Fighting Bhishma and Drona

June 05, 2025Literature4796
The Ethical Dilemma of Arjuna: Why He Refrained from Fighting Bhishma

The Ethical Dilemma of Arjuna: Why He Refrained from Fighting Bhishma and Drona

Arjuna, the rightful heir to the Pandava throne, faced a profound ethical dilemma during the Kurukshetra War. Despite his unwavering conviction that he had the ability to defeat both Bhishma and Drona easily, Arjuna chose not to engage in battle against his revered teacher and father. This predicament is often discussed in the context of the Indian epic, the Mahabharata.

Reasons Behind Arjuna's Decision

Arjuna had a deep emotional and ethical connection with both Bhishma and Drona. His relationship with Bhishma was rooted in familial love and respect, while Drona was his teacher, instilling in him the art of warfare. However, in the midst of battle, Arjuna's fundamental moral principles stood in the way of his attacking his instructors and relatives. This ethical struggle is profoundly captured in the famous Bhagavad Gita, also known as the Song of God, where Arjuna seeks guidance from Lord Krishna on how to resolve his dilemma.

Moral Principles in Warfare

Much of the Mahabharata explores the complexities of war and the moral dilemmas that arise during such conflicts. In this context, Arjuna’s refusal to fight Bhishma and Drona exemplifies the broader ethical questions surrounding the use of violence in the name of duty, honor, and righteousness. The ethical principles involved in warfare are paramount, and Arjuna's decision reflects the larger philosophical debates within the text.

The ethical principles that drive Arjuna's decision are deeply rooted in the concept of ahimsa (non-harm) and satya (truth). In the Bhagavad Gita, Lord Krishna argues that although Arjuna has the ability to defeat Bhishma and Drona, the poison of enmity would taint the victory. Krishna suggests that Arjuna should focus on the goal of righteousness (dharma) rather than on the desire for victory. This was further strengthened by the argument that the poison of enmity during Samudra Manthan (the churning of the ocean) not only brought forth the elixir of immortality (amrita) but also brought forth other harmful substances, indicating that the path to victory is not without its perils.

The Role of Krishna in Arjuna's Decision

Lord Krishna, being both Arjuna's charioteer and spiritual mentor, played a significant role in guiding Arjuna towards a path of righteousness. Krishna's detailed dialogue with Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita emphasizes the importance of fulfilling one's dharma while remaining detached from the fruits of action. This principle of detachment is crucial in the resolution of Arjuna's ethical dilemma, as Krishna guides him to act with courage and determination, even in the face of enemies who were once loved and respected.

Strategic Considerations

Apart from the ethical aspects, there were also strategic considerations. Bhishma was a formidable general, and Drona was renowned for his unmatched archery skills. Arjuna knew that any battle against them would be intense and fraught with danger. By not engaging in battle, Arjuna set a precedent for avoiding unnecessary conflict, aligning with his moral principles and reinforcing the notion of dharma.

Conclusion

Arjuna's decision to refrain from fighting Bhishma and Drona was a manifestation of his commitment to ethical principles and the continuation of his path of righteousness. This episode not only highlights the moral complexities of warfare but also underscores the enduring relevance of these values in the contemporary world. It reminds us that even in the most difficult and pressing situations, one must uphold their moral principles and act with wisdom and courage.