Sarumans Harsh Jibe: Did Grima Wormtongue Eat Lotho Baggins?

Saruman often employed dark humor and irony in his interactions, particularly when it came to characters like himself, who sought to assert dominance and instill fear. A prime example of this is the suggestion that Grima Wormtongue may have eaten Lotho Baggins. While Saruman's insinuation is undoubtedly a reflection of his malice, it is likely that the suggestion is a form of cruel humor rather than a factual statement. This article delves into the nuances of the situation, exploring the motivations and actions of Wormtongue, Lotho, and Saruman, and provides insights into Tolkien's utilization of dark humor.

The Symbiosis of Murder and Malice

It is widely accepted that Wormtongue murdered Lotho Baggins, but the suggestion that he may have eaten him is less concrete. Saruman's implication is more likely a cruel gibe to highlight the depths of Wormtongue's depravity, rather than a literal statement of the incident. Therefore, while Wormtongue's murder of Lotho is confirmed, the idea that he ate him is more of a jibe than a fact.

A Lie That Almost Got Him Killed

Either way, it was Saruman's last form of vengeance. Telling lies can sometimes be just as dangerous as telling the truth. Saruman, known for his penchant for manipulation, was only too willing to spread a malicious rumour about Wormtongue. This was in keeping with his character, as he had a history of starvation as punishment for his disobedience. Saruman’s manipulation culminated in his ordering Wormtongue to kill Lotho, likely as a result of Lotho's betrayal, particularly after Saruman locked up Lobelia.

Wormtongue was hesitant, being a spy rather than an assassin. However, his fear of Saruman's wrath compelled him to follow the order. Ultimately, Saruman betrayed him, as he had done with Frodo in a previous instance. This act of betrayal and the subsequent revelation of Wormtongue's role in Lotho's death were key to ensuring that the hobbits would blame Wormtongue and ensure his downfall.

A Lifelong Lie and a Legacy of Calmness

I do not believe that Wormtongue actually ate Lotho, given Saruman's infamy as a liar. He has deceived the population of Middle-earth on numerous occasions, and many of the Shire's hobbits wanted him dead. However, Frodo, who had experienced Saruman's transformation firsthand, did not want the wizard killed, as he had not been seriously injured and Frodo did not wish for Saruman to be killed in cold blood.

While Saruman was initially expelled from the Shire, Wormtongue followed him into exile, and Saruman called out to him, imploring him not to follow. He reassured Wormtongue that he had not done great evil. However, Saruman then revealed that Wormtongue had indeed killed Lotho and vaguely suggested that he may have eaten him, “for I have grown very hungry.”

This statement was a clear attempt to sow hate and distrust among the hobbits, ensuring that Wormtongue would be ostracized and his actions condemned.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Wormtongue's actions and Saruman's manipulation are deeply troubling, the suggestion that he ate Lotho is more likely a cruel device used by Saruman to fulfill his dark desires. Tolkien's use of this dark humor underscores the complex and morally ambiguous nature of his characters. The motivations of Wormtongue, Lotho, and Saruman are multifaceted, and their actions irreparably altered the course of Middle-earth's history.