Literature
Did Harriet Beecher Stowe Start the Civil War?
Did Harriet Beecher Stowe Start the Civil War?
President Lincoln is often quoted as jokingly saying, "So you are the little woman that caused this great war," in reference to Harriet Beecher Stowe and her book, Uncle Tom's Cabin. This book, in fact, became one of the best-selling books of its time, influencing Northerners’ views against slavery. However, it is a misconception to claim Uncle Tom's Cabin was the primary cause of the Civil War. Let's delve into the historical context and explore the real causes of the conflict.
The Role of Uncle Tom's Cabin
Uncle Tom's Cabin, published in 1852, served as a powerful tool in promoting anti-slavery views. Harriet Beecher Stowe was active in anti-slavery activities for years and collected well-verified narratives about the harsh realities of slavery, which she incorporated into her novel. While the book certainly contributed to the sentiment against slavery, it was not the only factor leading to the conflict.
The book painted a stark and emotive picture of the horrors of slavery, helping to tear away the romanticized and superficial depiction of the institution. However, it did not single-handedly cause people to take up arms against it. Other significant events and decisions, such as the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, also played crucial roles in intensifying the tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
The Dred Scott Decision and Its Impact
The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, handed down in 1857, was a landmark Supreme Court case. This decision effectively legalizing slavery in the territories, and stating that African Americans could not sue for their freedom, was a major catalyst for the coming of the Civil War. The decision also recognized the power of slave owners to bring their slaves into any state and set up businesses competing with free labor. This reinforced the fear that ordinary workers would be sidelined and negated the economic benefits of free labor.
This decision intensified the conflict between the North and the South, as it undermined the efforts of abolitionists to restrict the expansion of slavery. It stirred up resentment in the North and supported the positioning of proslavery forces in the South. Although Uncle Tom's Cabin contributed to the rising anti-slavery sentiment, it did not directly cause the outbreak of the Civil War.
The Immediate Causes of the Civil War
The immediate cause of the Civil War was the attack on Fort Sumter in South Carolina. On April 12, 1861, Confederate forces led by General P. G. T. Beauregard launched an artillery barrage on Fort Sumter, a Union-held fort. This attack is often cited as the official casus belli that started the conflict. The Southern states' decision to secede from the Union was driven by a belief that protecting slavery was more important than maintaining national unity.
While Uncle Tom's Cabin played a role in the anti-slavery movement, the fundamental issue that led to the Civil War was the continued existence of slavery, coupled with the belief that this institution should be expanded. The debates, such as the one between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas on the Dred Scott decision, exemplified the deep-seated differences between the two regions. The North did not initiate the war with the sole purpose of freeing slaves; rather, the conflict evolved from a combination of political, social, and economic factors.
Conclusion
Although Uncle Tom's Cabin was a significant literary and social work, it was not the sole catalyst for the Civil War. The decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford and the subsequent tensions between the North and the South played crucial roles in escalating the conflict. The Battle of Fort Sumter and the South's push for secession were the immediate precipitating events that led to the Civil War's outbreak.
Understanding the complex interplay of events and influences helps us to avoid oversimplifying the causes of such a pivotal event in American history. While Uncle Tom's Cabin did have a profound impact on societal views and moral stance, the full context of the Civil War is much broader and more multifaceted.