Introduction

The narratives of J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings and The Silmarillion detail the complex lives and legacies of significant figures from Middle-earth, notably including Anarion and Isildur. While both are crucial to the founding of Gondor, their paths in the perilous world of Middle-earth diverge significantly. This essay aims to explore the leadership dynamics and legacies of these two key figures, bringing to light the context and complex nature of their respective contributions to Gondor.

Leadership in the Founding of Gondor

Anarion and Isildur were twin sons of Elendil, leaders of the Númenórean exiles who founded Gondor and Arnor.

Anarion Leadership: As a co-founder of Gondor alongside his brother, Anarion demonstrated exceptional leadership. He continued to govern Gondor while Isildur led the armies against Sauron. Anarion's strong governance skills were evident in his ability to maintain the stability and strength of Gondor during a critical period.

Defense and Legacy

Defense of Gondor: Anárion remained in Gondor to defend the realm against Sauron's forces, showcasing his unwavering commitment to the safety and security of the kingdom.

Legacy: Anárion's legacy is intricately linked with the development and stability of Gondor. His descendants continued to play significant roles in Gondor's history, ensuring the dynasty endured and flourished.

Isildur's Military Heroism and Legacy

Isildur is often revered for his role in the War of the Last Alliance and his pivotal contribution to defeating Sauron. However, his legacy is often more controversial, particularly due to his choice to retain the One Ring.

Heroism: Isildur's bravery in the War of the Last Alliance, culminating in the significant act of cutting the One Ring from Sauron's hand, is widely celebrated.

Decision to Leave: The decision for Isildur to leave Anárion to defend Gondor alone could be interpreted in various ways. He may have felt a higher calling to participate in the war or had faith in his brother's ability to handle the defense.

Controversial Legacy: Isildur’s actions, such as taking the One Ring for himself, led to far-reaching consequences that affected the fate of Middle-earth. This decision became a central conflict in the narrative of The Lord of the Rings.

Mutual Respect and Different Roles

The text suggests that Anárion was pleased with Isildur's departure. This could imply a mutual understanding and respect between the brothers, each embracing their respective roles in the greater fight against evil.

Role of Aadarion: Anárion's role focused on governance and defense, ensuring the stability of Gondor. He is often associated with the defense of Osgiliath and the line of the Anduin.

Isildur's Military Role: Isildur took on a more active military role, seeking aid from the North. His life and death at the Gladden Fields marked a turning point in the narrative of Middle-earth.

Conclusion

While it is impossible to determine definitively if Anarion was better than Isildur, both figures exemplify the unique contributions required to shape the destiny of Gondor and Middle-earth. The contrasting nature of their leadership and roles underscores the complex interplay of governance and military prowess in establishing and defending a realm.

Argument Against Anarion's Pleasure with Isildur's Departure

Contrary to the initial quote from Unfinished Tales, which attributes the statement to Meneldil, son of Anárion, it is unlikely that Anárion was truly pleased with Isildur's departure. The statement may be attributed to Meneldil, who inherited Anárion's co-crown and appeared eager to be the sole ruler of Gondor. Meneldil knew that Isildur's overlordship would be remote and removed, even though Isildur remained the High King of both realms and Arnor.

With Isildur's death at the Gladden Fields and the passing of the infant heir Valandil, the combined rule under a High King effectively ended, as Meneldil did not defer to a young child.