Analysis of Jurassic Park: Preventing Nedry's Embryo Theft

Introduction

The 1993 blockbuster film Jurassic Park is renowned for its intricate plot and thrilling action sequences. One pivotal moment in the film revolves around Dennis Nedry's stealing of dinosaur embryos. In this analysis, we'll explore why the characters in InGen opted to let Nedry go through the fence, the potential outcomes if they had stopped him, and how unforeseen circumstances led to disastrous consequences.

Dennis Nedry's Actions and InGen's Decision

Dennis Nedry, an employee of InGen, built a back door in the system to shutdown the fences and security system. This action was aimed at facilitating the theft of dinosaur embryos. Instead of preventing Nedry from going through the fence, InGen's decision to let him proceed had multiple strategic reasons and unforeseen risks.

Had Nedry's theft been stopped earlier, the security systems would have remained intact. The theft would have been discovered, and the embryos would have been recovered. However, InGen undoubtedly faced operational challenges, and their decision to let Nedry proceed may have been seen as less risky compared to interrupting the delicate balance of their operation.

The Unforeseen Storm and its Impact

The 1991-1995 Pacific El Ni?o brought a severe storm to Isla Nublar. This natural disaster disrupted Nedry's planned route, causing him to get lost. The storm, a significant turning point in the film, led directly to Nedry's encounter with a dilophosaur. This fateful encounter not only ended his life but also led to the security systems not being re-enabled, contributing to the dinosaur escape.

The Consequences of Nedry's Actions

The failure to re-enable the security systems had devastating consequences. The escape of dinosaurs, excluding the raptors, was a direct result of Nedry's mistake. Similarly, turning off the raptor fences led to their eventual escape. However, Nedry's avoidance of the raptor fences reflects his wisdom in dealing with the more dangerous creatures.

John Hammond, the founder of InGen, acknowledged the severity of the situation and ordered the complete shutdown of the system to prevent any further escape. This decision, however, demonstrated a lack of foresight and planning, further exacerbating the crisis.

Potential Outcomes if Nedry was Stopped Earlier

If Nedry had been caught or stopped earlier, the outcome would have been vastly different. The security systems could have been maintained, and Nedry's theft would have been halted before triggering a chain of unfortunate events. The embryos could have been recovered, and the park could have continued to function with minimal disruption.

Moreover, the reliable reactivation of the security systems by Lex and Tim further highlighted the complex interplay between technology, human error, and unforeseen events. The normal startup sequence allowed for a smoother recovery, but it also underlined the risks of allowing Nedry the means to bypass the security protocols.

Conclusion

In Jurassic Park, the decision to let Nedry go through the fence with a backdoor, combined with the impacts of a severe storm, ultimately led to the disaster. This analysis demonstrates how strategic decisions, technological failures, and natural disasters can contribute to a catastrophic outcome. The film serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of comprehensive security protocols and the risks of underestimating the consequences of even minor procedural omissions.

References

1. Pacific El Ni?o 1991-1995 2. Embryo Theft 3. Back Door 4. Storm 5. Dilophosaur Encounter 6. Dinosaur Escape 7. Raptor Reasoning 8. Dino Park Disaster

Keywords

Jurassic Park Dennis Nedry Security System Dinosaur Escape InGen