Analysis of Criticisms and Dislikes of 'Robinson Crusoe'

Introduction

Since its publication in 1719, Daniel Defou2019s Robinson Crusoe has been one of the most widely read and influential novels in English literature. However, like many literary works, it has also faced criticism and dislike from various quarters. This article delves into the various criticisms and dislikes expressed by readers and critics, analyzing their reasons and implications.

Criticisms of the Narrative Style

Unrealistic and Formulaic

Many readers find the narrative style of Defoeu2019s Robinson Crusoe unrealistic and formulaic. The straightforward and detailed account of survival on a deserted island is often criticized for being too linear and lacking in complexity. Critics argue that the plot seems to follow a predictable pattern: hardship, struggle, and eventual triumph. This simplicity is seen as a drawback in a time when readers are seeking more nuanced and complex narratives.

Predetermination and Fate

The deterministic nature of the narrative is another point of criticism. Readers and critics note how the protagonistu2019s journey appears to be predetermined by fate and favorable circumstances. The continuous fortune-defying events, such as finding water, food, or shelter, can be seen as unrealistic and thus the relatability of the character is lost. This has led some to question the authenticity of the experiences detailed in the novel.

Dislike of the Protagonist

Inconsistent and One-dimensional

The portrayal of Robinson Crusoe as a one-dimensional character has also received considerable criticism. Critics argue that Crusoe portrays an inflexibly rigid attitude towards his beliefs and behaviors. While his initial desire to return to civilization is portrayed as natural, his transformation from a meek and fearful man to a hardened survivor seems overly exaggerated and unrealistic. This monolithic character development is often criticized for its lack of depth and nuance.

Machismo and Exploitation

Another aspect that has been frequently criticized is the portrayal of Crusoe as a macho and exploitative figure. His treatment of the Native American Friday has been seen as problematic, with some arguing that it reinforces colonialist and racist views. The idea of Crusoe as a colonialist hero who subjugates and exploits others for personal gain has been a source of significant criticism, especially in light of current understandings of history and society.

Technological and Historical Relevance

Outdated and Primitivist

Some readers and critics argue that the novel’s emphasis on survival skills and primitive living is outdated and impractical in today’s technological age. They point out that many of the techniques and methods described might be obsolete or impractical in the modern world. This has led to a perception of the novel as more of a historical artifact rather than a relevant text for contemporary audiences.

Narrative Inconsistencies

The narrative itself has also faced criticism for its inconsistencies. Some readers find the story disjointed and somewhat unbelievable, particularly when it comes to the miraculous survival and fortune of Crusoe. The sudden appearances of necessities like food and water make the narrative feel contrived and unrealistic, which diminishes the overall impact of the work.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Daniel Defou2019s Robinson Crusoe remains a significant literary work, it is not immune to criticism and dislike from readers and critics. Issues concerning the narrative style, protagonist portrayal, and the novel’s relevance in the modern context are some of the areas that have elicited strong reactions. These critiques highlight the evolving nature of literary interpretations and the ongoing dialogue between past and present in the world of literature.